[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Tweet
This is a modified version of the Internet RFC suitable for machine-translating. Original version is available here: RFC577

UNKNOWN
Network Working Group                                         D. Crocker
Request for Comments: 577                                       UCLA-NMC
NIC: 19356                                                  October 1973
References: RFC 524, 539, 555
Mail Priority

In RFC 539 (NIC--17644,3d:gy) Postel and I suggested that mail senders be allowed to assign a degree of priority to their mail. White (RFC 555--17993,6c:gy) objected to defining shades of urgency, without having their effects upon the Mail Protocol server also defined.

If priority levels were to be assigned by automata, I would agree with Jim. Unfortunately, the human sender of the mail will usually be the one to assign the priority, and humans will not be consistent in that assignment.

Also unfortunately, the concept of urgency is an integral part of communication. If it weren't, we could ignore its inclusion into the MP.

Since distinctions in urgency are useful (necessary?) and since humans will be the ones assigning specific degrees of urgency (thereby making it impossible for server processes to automatically do the "right thing" in response), we suggested only including the INFORMATION as part of the protocol. Let the human and server- process receivers decide between themselves how the server-process should deal with that information.

Now that I have argued all that, let me suggest interpretations for urgency values. This is so that programmers can have automata- generated mail (e.g., notification of the status of previously sent mail) carry reasonable urgency values:

10 Phone in the middle of the night, if necessary.
9 8 Deliver to user's terminal NOW. 7 6 Deliver to user's terminal only if user is at "exec"
level.
5 4 Deliver immediately after sign-on or before sign-off. 3 2 Deliver into standard mailbox. 1 0 Junk Mail [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Martin Lyngvig 7/99 ]
Crocker                                                         [Page 1]

RFC 577                      Mail Priority                  October 1973
Crocker [Page 2]

Translate documents to 日本語, svenska, Nederlands, Deutsch, français, русский, italiano, español, Tiếng Việt, polski, português, 中文, українська, català, norsk, فارسی, suomi, Bahasa Indonesia, العربية, čeština, 한국어, Bahasa Melayu, magyar, română, српски and other languages.
inserted by FC2 system