[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Tweet
This is a modified version of the Internet RFC suitable for machine-translating. Original version is available here: RFC679

UNKNOWN
Updated by: 703 
Network Working Group                                         D.W. Dodds
Request for Comments: 679                                     BBN-TENEXA
NIC: 31890                                                 February 1975
February, 1975, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers

It has been two and a half months since our last survey, and it has been depressing to note that "progress" toward an all-new-protocol network has been even slower than previously. Changes since the last list (with host numbers in octal):

SRI-ARC (2) and OFFICE-1 (53) have added logger sockets 27, but with Old-Protocol servers (are these forerunners of New-Protocol servers?);
SDC-CC (110) has been removed from the list until it starts operating
on the network
LL-67 (12) now has a New-Protocol server on socket 1; CASE-10 (15) has departed from the network; BBN-TENEX is now host 361 (formerly 105); ANL (ARGONNE, 67) has come on the net with Old- and New-Protocol
servers on sockets 1 and 27, respectively.

The following is the latest version* of the summary and tabulation of server-host Telnet servers. total server hosts 36 100% no New-Prot server 17 47% unknown status (new host) 1 3% total New-Prot implem. 18 50%
New-Prot on socket 27,
Old on socket 1 (2) 10 28%
New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 6 16% New-Prot on 1 only (3) 2 6% Notes:

* All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data. What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 20 Feb. 1975.

(2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to all protocols and conventions, as I understand them.

(3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New- Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs according to what control sequences are received.
Dodds                                                           [Page 1]

RFC 679          Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers      January 1975
Tabulation of server status for all server sites:
   Host     Host          Socket  Socket   New-Prot. Options
    No.     Name            1       27     Implemented (if any)
101 UCLA-CCN Old X 201 UCLA-CCBS Old X
     2     SRI-ARC         Old     Old
   102     SRI-AI          Old     New      I1,3,6; O3
     3     UCSB-MOD75      Old     X
4 UTAH-10 Old X
305 BBN-TENEXA Old New I1,3,6; O3
   106     MIT-DMS         New     New      I1,3; O3
   206     MIT-AI          Old     X
   306     MIT-ML          Old     X
     7     RAND-RCC        Old     X
10 SDC-LAB Old X 11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3 12 LL-67 New X None
112 LL-TX-2 Old X
13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3 16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3
116 CMU-10A New New I1,3; O3
17 I4-TENEX Old X
217 KI4B-TENEX Old X
20 AMES-67 New New None
126 USC-ISI Old New I1,3,6; O3
   226     USC-ISIB        Old     New      I1,3,6; O3
    27     USC-44          Old     X
   327     USC-ECL         Old     X
37 CCA-TENEX Old X 40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3 43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3
   344     HAWAII-500      ?       ?
    52     LONDON          Old     X
    53     OFFICE-1        Old     Old
54 MIT-MULTICS New New None 61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3 361 BBN-TENEX Old New I1,3,6; O3 162 BBN-TENEXD Old New I1,3,6; O3
67 ANL Old New I1,3,6; O3
Dodds                                                           [Page 2]

RFC 679          Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers      January 1975
Key:

X No server at this socket ? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #") O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #") (# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented by anyone are:

0 Transmit-Binary 1 Echo 3 Suppress-Go-Ahead 6 Timing-Mark )

Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option requests.










[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] [ support from BBN Corp. and its successors. 7/2000 ]






















Dodds [Page 3]

Translate documents to 日本語, svenska, Nederlands, Deutsch, français, русский, italiano, español, Tiếng Việt, polski, português, 中文, українська, català, norsk, فارسی, suomi, Bahasa Indonesia, العربية, čeština, 한국어, Bahasa Melayu, magyar, română, српски and other languages.
inserted by FC2 system